Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateDec 29 '16 at 10:11
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 118
56% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 334
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
Asus(1043 03BC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 26.5
26% 27.1 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 29.1
21% 24.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 479
Write 358
Mixed 387
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 19.9
97% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 37
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 19.5
36% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 129
Write 137
Mixed 126
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.29
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
396GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 149
Write 107
Mixed 103
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.33
124% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
75GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45% Average
Read 84.1
Write 72.6
Mixed 70.6
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
47GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 74.1
Write 61.7
Mixed 63.5
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 12.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback