Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 752
76% 619 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 36FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 103
Parallax 74.3
107% 103 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79
Splatting 103
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 214
Mixed 293
72% 330 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.8
182% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 303
228% 308 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
42GB free
Firmware: AADA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 292 220 216 200 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,345
Write 318
Mixed 978
SusWrite 249
159% 722 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.1
213% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 286
297% 494 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 162%
Great: 193%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
421GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 155 154 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 153
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 153
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-2800C16-8GRK F4-3200C16-8GVKB 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 43.9
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 21.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback