Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 19:51
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 202
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 590
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.8% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 57.8
50% 61.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 52.9
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 180 173 173 168 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 464
Mixed 373
SusWrite 214
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.6
164% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 325
233% 298 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
678GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 96.9
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.4
418% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate M3 2TB
710GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 51 53 59 61 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 73
Write 79.7
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 52.5
55% 73 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 67%
HitachiG ST 2TB
257GB free, PID 1015
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 37 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 38.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 38.3
51% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 51%
WDC WD10 EARS-22Y5B1 1TB
368GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.4% Very poor
Read 89
Write 89.5
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 1
81% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 17%
WDC WD25 EZRX-00MMMB0 2.5TB
707GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 2.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 89
Write 83.7
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 0.8
73% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 41%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 52 48 51 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 89
Write 79.7
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 52.1
91% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 36%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
930GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 53 48 51 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
Read 78
Write 82
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 52.3
87% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 38%
WD Elements 1TB
128GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 47 48 49 48 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 50
Write 51.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 47.2
64% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 2TB
1TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 90 87 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 89.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 89
99% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 40.5
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 20.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $997
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback