| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '20 at 17:27 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
86% 155 Pts
|
74% 588 Pts
|
41% 662 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90.7%
Outstanding
|
94% 113 fps
|
84% 106 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 303 300 302 300 300 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
76% 338 MB/s
|
165% 62.7 MB/s
|
204% 305 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 211 203 207 204 202 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.9%
Very good
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
58% 69.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,802 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,299x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,141x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 564x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 308x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 267x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |