Asus H61M-F

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-F (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131212
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '20 at 17:24
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 92 2-Core 95.1 62% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 302 37% 281 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 3025) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.11 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 1.83 2% 1.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 225 214 223 224 227 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.6% Good	Read 246 Write 227 Mixed 200 SusWrite 222 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 31.3 98% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 145% 189 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 285GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0 0 0 0.2 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 53.7 Write 60.6 Mixed 24 SusWrite 0.2 25% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 226GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 134 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 133 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 392GB free Firmware: 150. SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 61 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 88.6 Write 91.4 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 61.2 54% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 309GB free Firmware: 100. SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 90 Write 90 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 61.3 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 266GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 139 139 138 140 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 146 Write 101 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 139 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 27,462 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.3% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 6.1 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	20x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	18x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	15x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	31x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	4x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 25%, 525 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16