Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 15:20
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 21.4
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 121
37% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 166
25% 180 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 59.2
54% 63.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 54.2
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 310 323 331 326 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 337
Write 323
Mixed 286
SusWrite 306
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 35.2
112% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 249
186% 247 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 129%
Lacie P9233 4TB
233GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 118 120 127 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 65.2
Write 101
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 119
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate M3 2TB
347GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 122 121 126 122 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 74.9
Write 126
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 118
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
1TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 72 74 73 78 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 23
Write 22.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 72.1
49% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 100%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
192GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 95 97 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 99.7
Write 101
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 93.5
124% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 67%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
499GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 86.6
Write 89
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 94.6
114% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 310
13% 310 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback