Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	18.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3210-$70 7,331 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 54.3 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 152 55% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 210 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8319) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 8.35 Parallax 2.84 7% 6.6 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 6.13 5% 6.68 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240 240GB 1,127 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 205 9.9 57 28 11 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.2% Very poor	Read 245 Write 218 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 72.6 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF KVT8FP-HYC 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	165x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	50x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16