Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	4.94% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,487 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 45.9 34% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 71.7 8-Core 101 11% 86.4 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Galax TA1D0240A 240GB 2,348 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM81.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 45 44 42 36 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	4.94% Terrible	Read 50.4 Write 43.2 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 43 10% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 1% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 4.94% Great: 89%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.8 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Read 17.6 Write 3.7 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.8 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 PC 4G 1600 99P5471-004.A01LF 6GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples	62x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	48x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	37x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16