| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190322 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '20 at 01:58 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
86%
Excellent
|
84% 150 Pts
|
71% 570 Pts
|
42% 676 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.6%
Average
|
47% 60.3 fps
|
46% 57.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 119 7 6.7 6.4 7.1 MB/s
|
68.7%
Good
|
79% 355 MB/s
|
107% 40.2 MB/s
|
84% 174 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
827GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 122 123 123 124 MB/s
|
73.4%
Very good
|
92% 124 MB/s
|
156% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.1%
Very good
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
57% 70.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,817 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 642x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 139x |
| Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples | 138x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 165x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 116x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 113x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $529 |