Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 235
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 668
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.1% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 22.4
19% 24.6 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 30.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1074 847 848 835 809 819 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,622
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,642
SusWrite 872
333% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 73.4
268% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 853
653% 887 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 241%
Great: 340%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
201GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 143 152 157 135 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 302
Write 212
Mixed 226
SusWrite 150
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 35.2
127% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 158
124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 85%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 336 340 340 340 340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 344
Mixed 280
SusWrite 339
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 37.1
139% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 65.6
128% 257 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 104%
AMD T00 StoreMI 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 191 186 191 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 127
Mixed 77
SusWrite 190
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
715GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 83.8
86% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 34.7
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback