Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 146% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 89.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 242 91% 160 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 992 93% 775 Pts	64-Core 1,546 96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 209 Reflection 220 Parallax 236 170% 222 fps	MRender 253 Gravity 204 Splatting 139 156% 198 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,012 Write 2,165 Mixed 1,701 438% 1,959 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 66.2 227% 83.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,220 DQ Write 972 DQ Mixed 1,104 824% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 266GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 910 864 833 825 839 840 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 950 Write 910 Mixed 720 SusWrite 852 193% 858 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 57.3 189% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 752 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 471 419% 631 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 445%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 181GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 228 160 212 160 160 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,371 Write 1,229 Mixed 969 SusWrite 352 219% 980 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 77.8 273% 98.8 MB/s	DQ Read 960 DQ Write 877 DQ Mixed 326 407% 721 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 282%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 13,939 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 466GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 795 622 621 618 616 613 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 955 Write 916 Mixed 688 SusWrite 648 180% 802 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 57.9 198% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 753 DQ Write 672 DQ Mixed 695 526% 707 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 313%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB 13,747 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 238GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 875 884 880 886 887 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 946 Write 904 Mixed 600 SusWrite 879 187% 832 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 44.5 154% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 732 DQ Write 550 DQ Mixed 307 320% 530 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 237%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 59 63 61 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 16.5 Write 30.7 Mixed 26 SusWrite 58.4 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 66%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 86 86 87 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 12.5 Write 16 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 86.6 50% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 21 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 23.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,850x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,605x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	553x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	639x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	252x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16