Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181113
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 95
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 479
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 15.5
13% 15 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 17
Splatting 18.7
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN256NVMe-M.2/80 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 740 502 349 351 462 570 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,148
Write 953
Mixed 825
SusWrite 496
191% 856 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 31.5
148% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 71.1
158% 319 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 140%
Great: 197%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 219 225 187 33 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 198
Write 108
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 164
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.4
43% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 17
13% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 100%
WD WD1502FYPS-01U1B1 1.5TB
10GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 74 78 76 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 83.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 79.5
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
2GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50
Write 55.7
Mixed 35.5
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback