PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181113 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 21:40 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
73.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asgard AN256NVMe-M.2/80 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 740 502 349 351 462 570 MB/s
|
140%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 219 225 187 33 140 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1502FYPS-01U1B1 1.5TB
10GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 74 78 76 82 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 267x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 107x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |