Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.83% Terrible	Memory 9.85 1-Core 5.7 2-Core 11.4 6% 8.98 Pts	4-Core 21.2 8-Core 28.6 3% 24.9 Pts	64-Core 28 2% 28 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 6.83% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 1.38 3% 3.1 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.52 3% 3.78 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c86 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 158 153 149 152 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.3% Poor	Read 175 Write 160 Mixed 157 SusWrite 152 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 6.9 23% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 0707 GU672203EP0200 0198 HP536727-H41-ELD 7GB 1066, 1334, 1600 MHz 2048, 1024, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.87 GB/s	Latency 405 10% 405 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	1x

SSD
MTFDDAK256TDL 256GBCrucialBench 82%, 59 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 80AD HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16