Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 229 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 931 81% 689 Pts	64-Core 1,528 95% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Lighting 85.5 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 80.3 70% 87.2 fps	MRender 88.6 Gravity 88 Splatting 91.1 73% 89.2 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 748GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2469 2429 2155 2277 2331 2284 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	368% Outstanding	Read 2,566 Write 2,133 Mixed 1,492 SusWrite 2,324 478% 2,129 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 79.6 271% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 958 DQ Write 830 DQ Mixed 900 673% 896 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 368% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 213GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2121 2166 2203 2198 2203 2148 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	358% Outstanding	Read 2,369 Write 2,030 Mixed 1,464 SusWrite 2,173 451% 2,009 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 82.5 285% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,020 DQ Write 866 DQ Mixed 950 710% 945 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 358% Great: 393%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2TB free Firmware: DN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 150 150 151 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$175 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 191 191 191 190 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$242 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 177 177 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 137 135 133 139 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 194 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 137 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.8 238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 110%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 159 161 162 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 124 Write 110 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 160 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 97%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 5TB free Firmware: LEGNT3D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 227 224 230 222 224 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 200 Mixed 92.1 SusWrite 226 130% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.3 299% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 8x16GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	MC Read 64.7 MC Write 63.8 MC Mixed 57.4 177% 62 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 23.8 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16