| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw4600 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA0h |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120709 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 17:12 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
39.4%
Below average
|
35% 53.9 Pts
|
16% 117 Pts
|
7% 106 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 775 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
|
4.1%
Terrible
|
4% 5.11 fps
|
4% 5.26 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ML6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 52 66 78 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
46% 63.3 MB/s
|
91% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28
393GB free
Firmware: GKAOA70M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 68 69 69 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
49% 66.3 MB/s
|
167% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw4600 Workstation Builds (Compare 189 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw4600 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 24x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 21x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
| Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples | 12x |
| Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $132 |