PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 06FW8P |
Memory | 42.4 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110121 |
Uptime | 11.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 142 134 133 137 134 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$38
22GB free
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 17 62 88 23 46 MB/s
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
192GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 125 116 123 118 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 7x8GB
7 of 12 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 163x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 88x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 54x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |