Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 98
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 287
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 115
Parallax 96.6
84% 105 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 389 416 421 386 376 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 420
Mixed 429
SusWrite 392
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 46.3
146% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 220
168% 226 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 119%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
123GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 86 92 81 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 90
Write 87.7
Mixed 95
SusWrite 89.8
68% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
222GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 175 174 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 156
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 174
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback