Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 222 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 618 63% 509 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1264) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Lighting 5.53 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 5.81 4% 7.64 fps	MRender 6.76 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 11.3 7% 7.72 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 826GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 149 131 125 129 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 1x4GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.5 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,872x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,495x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	680x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	822x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	253x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	195x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	598x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	407x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	276x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16