Supermicro X8SIL

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X8SIL (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X8SIL
Memory	8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100527
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 14:56
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 60.5 33% 49.3 Pts	4-Core 73.5 8-Core 93.7 11% 83.6 Pts	64-Core 92 6% 92 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3737) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 62.1 39% 55.5 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 61.9 Splatting 63.9 52% 64 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 96 92 74 73 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.2% Poor	Read 169 Write 180 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 95.9 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 6.3 52% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 53.6 DQ Mixed 21.3 21% 33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 91GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 100 99 99 100 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 56.8 Write 59 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 98.4 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X8SIL Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X8SIL

CPU
Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples	20x
Xeon X3430IntelBench 61%, 4,096 samples	8x
Xeon X3460IntelBench 68%, 780 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	8x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	4x
FirePro V4900AMD $150Bench 7%, 2,218 samples	4x

SSD
120GB 120GBRescue08rm22ar120hyBench 60%, 9 samples	4x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	2x
X400 2.5 7MM 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 1,555 samples	2x

RAM
M393B1K73CHD-YF8 M393B1K73DH0-YF8 M393B1K73CHD-YF8 M393B1K73CHD-YF8 32GBSamsungBench 28%, 6 samples	6x
M393B1K73CHD-YF8 2x8GBSamsungBench 36%, 18 samples	5x
HP669238-071-HYE 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 10 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16