| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150723 |
| Uptime | 11.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 14:04 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.6%
Good
|
73% 118 Pts
|
36% 269 Pts
|
16% 263 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
17% 18.4 fps
|
16% 20.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 77 82 81 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
28% 125 MB/s
|
107% 41.8 MB/s
|
68% 98.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 123 124 123 MB/s
|
78.6%
Very good
|
98% 133 MB/s
|
225% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905584-032.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
52.7%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
66% 60.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,401 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 190x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 139x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 119x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 125x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |