Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55 15,354 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 162 75% 123 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 302 39% 296 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 3.97 3% 4.19 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 3.37 Splatting 9.52 6% 6.66 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 148 148 119 245 149 MB/s Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.6% Good	Read 154 Write 101 Mixed 281 SusWrite 179 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 37.9 143% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 39.3 36% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 302GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 117 123 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 124 Write 119 Mixed 64 SusWrite 121 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 195GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 83 86 87 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 141 Write 116 Mixed 20 SusWrite 87.7 113% 91 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 8A0E AD41G08SKU24 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	70.9% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 21.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,071x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	278x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	300x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16