PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151224 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '20 at 10:29 |
Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 136 145 145 160 162 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BD160 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 48x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 26x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 31x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |