Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba dynabook EX/3GW (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PCBA Type A
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190417
Uptime	11.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 07:11
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7130U 4,991 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 51.1 2-Core 157 59% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 238 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Toshiba(1179 001D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 10 Parallax 6.56 5% 7.72 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 5.63 Splatting 14 9% 10 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 34 48 40 21 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 472 Write 392 Mixed 393 SusWrite 84.5 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 1.1 55% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 0.6 50% 119 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	62.2% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 18.6 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 22.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16