Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 75 2-Core 137 59% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 445 43% 354 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.9% Very good	Lighting 96.5 Reflection 110 Parallax 99.2 79% 102 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 94.5 Splatting 100 80% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 667GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 263 237 284 262 260 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 466 Write 408 Mixed 407 SusWrite 256 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 42.8 137% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 73 DQ Mixed 7.1 48% 117 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 417GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 342 406 411 414 409 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 404 Mixed 383 SusWrite 382 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 45.4 147% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 256 190% 253 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 236 234 204 281 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 455 Write 403 Mixed 387 SusWrite 244 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 46.8 149% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 203 153% 209 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 10,150 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16