Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '20 at 02:09
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6402P 15,913 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 99.1 2-Core 214 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 400 55% 406 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 203B) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 30.8 27% 29.7 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 31.5 27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: FSLAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 241 272 341 320 281 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 444 Write 351 Mixed 246 SusWrite 280 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 37.1 117% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 217 171% 243 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 189 191 191 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 175 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 190 100% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GB 2,347 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 17.2 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	393x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	260x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	205x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	50x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	59x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	48x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16