Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 101
52% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 200
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2010) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 25.1
25% 26.1 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 29
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 145 143 145 146 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 234
Write 355
Mixed 234
SusWrite 143
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 35.4
111% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 44.7
36% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
592GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 273 277 284 283 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 397
Write 367
Mixed 338
SusWrite 275
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 42.4
137% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 55.6
45% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
419GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 147 143 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 365
Write 371
Mixed 298
SusWrite 144
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 40
126% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 38.8
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 51.5
43% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback