HP DX7500 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP DX7500 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A84h
Memory1.6 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 20:38
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 66.3
33% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 70.2
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 65.7
4% 65.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 2A84)
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.58 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 53 55 51 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 9
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 53
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback