| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A75-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111013 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 19:57 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
30.7%
Below average
|
33% 52.2 Pts
|
9% 65.4 Pts
|
5% 73.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 240
Gigabyte(1458 22B0) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
|
6.64%
Terrible
|
7% 9.33 fps
|
6% 7.82 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 56 74 91 91 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
56% 75.7 MB/s
|
178% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
25% 160 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A75-V EVO Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 12x |
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $226 |