| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130423 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 19:44 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.9%
Average
|
48% 73.2 Pts
|
12% 91.8 Pts
|
6% 103 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
17% 19.6 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 123 121 148 159 76 MB/s
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
92% 127 MB/s
|
147% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
208GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 48 45 49 49 49 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
47% 64 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140
88GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 45 49 49 49 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
35% 47.7 MB/s
|
142% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
33.4%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,059 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 267x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 184x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 134x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $175 |