Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 18:49
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 64 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 122 50% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 306 30% 248 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.2% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 143 Parallax 124 99% 129 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 131 Splatting 105 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S2128G 128GB 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: D110225a SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 14 10 5.3 0.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 214 Write 56 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 8.3 16% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 10.7 26% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 11.8 DQ Write 6.4 DQ Mixed 7.7 6% 8.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 37%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 28GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,007 Write 735 Mixed 494 164% 745 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 44.7 149% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 472 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 352 280% 394 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD 12,276 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 171GB free Firmware: CS303225 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1103 1083 949 921 917 904 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 817 Write 864 Mixed 620 SusWrite 979 185% 820 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 47.7 148% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 201 151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 286%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 28GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 110 77 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 90.5 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 113 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 61GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 95 95 96 96 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 108 Write 114 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 96.2 71% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 75%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$99 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 17GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 78 97 82 90 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 63 SusWrite 88.1 65% 88 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 86%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 12GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 52 58 54 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 60.8 Write 62.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 58.5 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 53GB free Firmware: 3.CHF SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 59 58 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 59.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 59.2 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 4x4GB 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16