| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081014 |
| Uptime | 7.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 14:55 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
40.1%
Average
|
34% 48.5 Pts
|
14% 101 Pts
|
6% 103 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E850) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
10% 11 fps
|
10% 11.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 480GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 94 97 100 98 100 MB/s
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
18% 79.1 MB/s
|
16% 4.7 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
188GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 70 67 70 70 71 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
44% 59.9 MB/s
|
153% 1 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
587GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 97 99 101 100 101 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
67% 90.6 MB/s
|
188% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.1%
Very poor
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
34% 118 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K Builds (Compare 355 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K - $65
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 91x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 34x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $285 |