Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 14:40
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 66.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 269
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 937
91% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,389
86% 1,389 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 127
Parallax 142
109% 134 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 130
Splatting 103
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1302 958 999 1019 1010 951 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,514
SusWrite 1,040
378% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 77.4
246% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 1052
DQ Mixed 1,131
847% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 278%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
41GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 375 390 385 387 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 409
Mixed 424
SusWrite 386
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 53.8
174% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 106%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 168 155 200 179 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 20.7
Write 116
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 162
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 106%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 150 144 151 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 145
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 149
191% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 96%
Apple iPod 160GB
118GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 21
Write 20.8
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 34.9
32% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 23.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,487
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback