HP Compaq DC7900SFF (FU036ET)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq DC7900SFF (FU036ET)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3031h
Memory2.8 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 14:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 83.1
45% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 87.7
8-Core 88.4
12% 88.1 Pts
64-Core 90.1
6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 320.18
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.7
Write 36.9
Mixed 77.7
15% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 24.4
90% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 28.6
25% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 51%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
156GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.6
Write 29.3
Mixed 47.3
40% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback