Asrock Z97 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 107
37% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 336
31% 260 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 0460) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 45
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 38.2
28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 240 258 272 285 278 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 258
Write 198
Mixed 201
SusWrite 264
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 8.3
31% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 200
159% 222 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
54GB free
Firmware: CT100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 54 55 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 61
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 56.7
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 42%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
211GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 81 83 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 80
Write 96.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 82.1
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
212GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 78 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 63.5
Write 69.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 79.3
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 84%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
2GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 15 16 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 103
Write 17.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 14.8
36% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 31%
7GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.9 2.9 4.5 3.8 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.38% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.5
5% 5.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 16.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme4 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback