HP ProLiant ML350 G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP ProLiant ML350 G6 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 170 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 524 53% 428 Pts	64-Core 1,179 73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 126 126 127 63 72 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 156 Write 35.8 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 96.2 21% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 16.3 75% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 2 15% 33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 466GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 11.8 Mixed 19 SusWrite 12.1 15% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 113 118 118 120 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 102 Write 118 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 107 73% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.3 5.6 6 5.1 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Read 1.9 Write 0.8 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 5.3 3% 2.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 18 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant ML350 G6 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant ML350 G6

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56451stBench 59%, 1,766 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x
Ultimate SU800 256GBAdata $54Bench 91%, 40,725 samples	4x
THNSNJ400PCSZ 400GBToshibaBench 94%, 56 samples	4x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	9x
20GBUnknownBench 39%, 10,519 samples	8x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16