| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus ET2210 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK ET2210 |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111011 |
| Uptime | 11 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '20 at 10:33 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
58% 92.9 Pts
|
18% 130 Pts
|
8% 133 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 84CF) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.46
|
2%
Terrible
|
2% 1.95 fps
|
2% 2.56 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 34 22 71 76 77 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
48% 65.3 MB/s
|
168% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 8GB
7GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.2 MB/s
|
9.01%
Terrible
|
17% 14.2 MB/s
|
138% 2.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.3%
Below average
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
54% 74.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ET2210 Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus ET2210
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 3x |
| Pentium G620Intel $30Bench 46%, 12,899 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples | 6x |
| GeForce 610MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,874 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $212 |