Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 10:18
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 118 52% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 379 39% 317 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Lighting 5.67 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 2.41 5% 7.42 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 12.9 8% 9.11 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 398 401 401 400 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,201 Write 1,851 Mixed 1122 SusWrite 570 268% 1186 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 68 216% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 775 DQ Write 653 DQ Mixed 721 538% 716 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 302%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 131 129 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 124 Write 127 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 129 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 2.4 474% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 70%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 13GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.3 8.6 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 7.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 9.1 11% 7.75 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 11.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,693x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	921x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,556x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,057x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	875x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16