Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Wortmann Q1585N (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101025
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 09:18
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 131 54% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 185 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M 977 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 4.17 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 1.69 3% 3.91 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 2.73 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: GN00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 47 66 63 67 71 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 13.8 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 52.2 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G3S1067M.C16F 2x4GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	25% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.8 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16