DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory15.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '20 at 05:15
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 62
2-Core 107
54% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 317
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 30.1
19% 26.2 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 23
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$82
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 104 128 128 87 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 244
Write 232
Mixed 227
SusWrite 119
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 21.1
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 175
135% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 127%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 31 38 30 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 13.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 37.9
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 75%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 44.3
Write 43
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 45.5
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 14 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 18.3
Mixed 17
SusWrite 15.4
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback