Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 35.9 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 57.7 26% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 90.8 8-Core 102 13% 96.7 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 071B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7755 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 6.62 5% 7.48 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 6.03 Splatting 13.3 8% 9.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB 11,716 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4152012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 175 176 175 176 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 339 Write 265 Mixed 229 SusWrite 179 57% 253 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 10.6 34% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 217 158% 204 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 2x8GB 1,950 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.3 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	174x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	15x
SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GBIntelBench 64%, 3,152 samples	9x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	7x

RAM
2x4GB0Bench 58%, 1,733 samples	107x
2x8GB0Bench 63%, 1,950 samples	36x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16