Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 175 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 498 53% 421 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.6% Average	Lighting 54.9 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 95.8 45% 74.7 fps	MRender 77.3 Gravity 77 Splatting 65.2 59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 353 266 225 218 193 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 446 Write 418 Mixed 403 SusWrite 272 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 33.2 111% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 301 227% 304 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 411GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 102 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 166 Write 148 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 103 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB 602 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 29.7 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	432x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	200x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	53x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	35x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	28x
F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 65%, 473 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16