PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090910 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 25 '20 at 18:36 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
44%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2877) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS723216L9A360 160GB-$69
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC2OC35F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 63 67 74 69 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 7.9 13 9.6 12 11 MB/s
|
7.61%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 13x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 5x |
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 4x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |