PC Intel Z370

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	PC Intel Z370 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 231 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 705 69% 564 Pts	64-Core 571 35% 571 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Zotac(19DA 2543) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 63 Reflection 9.12 Parallax 66.8 51% 46.3 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 39.9 37% 44.9 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: P181106a SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 123 117 164 133 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 331 Write 67.2 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 130 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 14.6 53% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 61.2 DQ Mixed 26.7 24% 36 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 44GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 124 145 146 145 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 134 Write 138 Mixed 79 SusWrite 140 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GB 4,992 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 93.9 43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel Z370 Builds (Compare 1,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

System: PC Intel Z370

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	299x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	221x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	192x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	117x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	105x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	74x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	32x

RAM
CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 89%, 9,947 samples	74x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	73x
CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,197 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $671

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16