Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190124
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 246 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 453 8-Core 725 72% 589 Pts	64-Core 660 41% 660 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 53.9 Parallax 48.2 49% 54.1 fps	MRender 45.1 Gravity 51.6 Splatting 49.3 40% 48.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 240GB 2,170 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1127A SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 417 425 427 421 414 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 463 Write 400 Mixed 342 SusWrite 418 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 23.7 116% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 33.9 70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 168%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 608GB free Firmware: SBFK61F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 415 428 328 105 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 411 Mixed 350 SusWrite 298 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 37.4 140% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 229 197% 288 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 1x8GB 676 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.6 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,849x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,478x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,386x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	498x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	355x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	221x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	275x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16