PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121016 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '20 at 22:21 |
Run Duration | 218 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 174 181 71 45 41 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
184GB free
Firmware: 1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 838 838 845 847 844 MB/s
|
186%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
47GB free
Firmware: M C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 129 123 114 105 68 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
152GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 70 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
220GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 65 64 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
436GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 98 98 99 96 MB/s
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
36.4%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 119x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 75x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 66x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $527 |