| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5E WS Pro (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080306 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '20 at 21:36 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.3%
Average
|
44% 64 Pts
|
12% 86.2 Pts
|
5% 84.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 839E) 1GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
10% 12.4 fps
|
12% 14.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 37 48 48 45 45 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
18% 82.7 MB/s
|
69% 23.6 MB/s
|
18% 26.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 48 37 25 22 36 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
17% 22.7 MB/s
|
23% 0.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
21%
Poor
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
46% 87.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5E WS Pro Builds (Compare 29 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5E WS Pro
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 2x |
| Quadro FX 570NvidiaBench 1%, 1,354 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |