Asrock H97 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H97 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	54%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 127 56% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 364 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Lighting 76.3 Reflection 78.9 Parallax 67.9 62% 74.4 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 71.6 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 220 219 216 212 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 401 Write 221 Mixed 207 SusWrite 214 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 30.5 99% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 260 204% 286 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 119%
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HAJQ-00000 1TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 175GB free Firmware: MVT0300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 430 432 435 437 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Read 441 Write 388 Mixed 347 SusWrite 409 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 33.1 108% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 348 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.8 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Pro4 - $287

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	138x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	90x
Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	69x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	83x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	44x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	24x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $710

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16