Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 109 42% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 422 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 1,005 62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 216 216 218 214 216 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 217 Write 204 Mixed 198 SusWrite 216 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 18.9 81% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 32 62% 125 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CH9 12x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 12 of 12 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 28.3 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16