ECT A_M_I

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 970A-UD3P
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150601
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 19:23
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 131 61% 97 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 381 36% 300 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled) 5,438 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 8406) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Lighting 63.1 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 50 51% 49.2 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 32.3 32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 120 128 139 104 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 377 Write 322 Mixed 118 SusWrite 137 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 11.4 40% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 56%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 73 78 91 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 88.2 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 85.3 57% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 51%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 213 Write 106 Mixed 41.3 126% 120 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 7.5 610% 8.77 MB/s	DQ Read 11.5 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 8.3 600% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB 2,652 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 17.6 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 13.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: ECT A_M_I

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	32x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	6x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	17x
CM3B8G2C1600L11 2x8GBCorsairBench 56%, 507 samples	9x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 8,984 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16