HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3577
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-240 462 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	25.7% Poor	Memory 48.9 1-Core 16.4 2-Core 16.1 22% 27.1 Pts	4-Core 18.1 8-Core 16.2 2% 17.2 Pts	64-Core 17.3 1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3577) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 10 7.4 9.1 11 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 69.1 Write 65.6 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 10.3 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 50%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 8GB 304 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.2 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.9 5% 4.07 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.76% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 4 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Presario CQ43 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ43 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	22x
Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples	17x
Celeron B815IntelBench 42%, 2,620 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	51x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	18x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	3x

RAM
SH564128FH8NZPHSCG Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 6 samples	4x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GBNanyaBench 32%, 3 samples	3x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 1x4GBSmartBench 25%, 800 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16